There is a certain poetry — the kind that even the most tone-deaf royal couldn’t miss — in a man being clapped in irons on his birthday. Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, the gentleman formerly known as His Royal Highness Prince Andrew, Duke of York, woke up on the morning of February 19, 2026, at Wood Farm on the Sandringham Estate. He turned sixty-six. By mid-morning, six unmarked police vehicles had rolled up the drive. The birthday candles, one imagines, went unlit.
Thames Valley Police arrested the erstwhile prince on suspicion of misconduct in public office — a charge that carries, let the record show, a maximum sentence of life imprisonment in the United Kingdom. Officers simultaneously conducted searches at two addresses: the Sandringham property in Norfolk where Andrew now resides (having recently been evicted from the considerably grander Royal Lodge in Berkshire by his own brother, the King), and at Royal Lodge itself, his home of two decades until earlier this month. The police, adhering to standard British protocol, declined to name their suspect in their official statement, referring only to “a man in his sixties from Norfolk.” But nobody was fooled. Nobody has been fooled for quite some time.
The Man Who Couldn’t Sweat
To understand how a prince of the realm ended up in the back seat of an unmarked car on a grey February morning, one must rewind through a saga so lurid, so preposterously ill-managed, that it reads less like a constitutional crisis and more like a plot rejected by the writers of The Crown for being too on the nose.
The friendship between Andrew and the American financier Jeffrey Epstein — a man whose business model was never entirely clear to anyone except prosecutors — began in 1999, brokered by the socialite Ghislaine Maxwell. In the gilded circles where these people moved, introductions were currency, and the then-prince and the future convicted sex offender got along famously. Epstein attended events at Windsor Castle and Sandringham House. Andrew was a guest at Epstein’s properties in New York and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Photos would later emerge of the two men hunting together at Balmoral, sharing the royal box at Ascot, and in various states of ease that suggested a friendship far deeper and longer than Andrew ever wished to admit.
Then the floor gave way. Epstein’s 2008 conviction for procuring a minor for prostitution should have been the off-ramp. For any man with a functioning sense of self-preservation — let alone one whose every public move reflected upon the Crown — the appropriate response was a clean break and a curt “no comment.” Andrew, displaying the instincts of a moth near a spotlight, instead visited Epstein in New York in 2010, after the man’s release from prison. They were photographed together in Central Park. The image has aged about as well as you’d expect.
“Nobody is above the law.”Prime Minister Keir Starmer, February 19, 2026
Virginia Giuffre and the Allegations That Would Not Disappear
The most damaging and persistent allegations against Andrew came from Virginia Roberts Giuffre, who claimed that Epstein and Maxwell trafficked her to have sex with the then-prince on three occasions — twice when she was just seventeen years old. Giuffre alleged encounters in London, New York, and on Epstein’s private island. Flight logs corroborated her presence in those locations at the relevant times. A photograph surfaced showing Andrew with his arm around Giuffre’s waist, Maxwell smiling in the background. Andrew’s supporters questioned the photo’s authenticity. Andrew himself said he had “no recollection” of meeting her and, memorably, “absolutely no memory” of the photograph being taken.
The world got to hear Andrew’s version of events in full during a November 2019 BBC Newsnight interview with Emily Maitlis — an hour of television that will be studied in crisis-communications courses for generations, and not as a model of best practice. Asked about Giuffre’s allegation of a specific encounter in London, Andrew offered the alibi that he had been at a Pizza Express in Woking with his daughter. He also claimed that a medical condition from the Falklands War had left him unable to sweat — a detail Giuffre had mentioned in her account. The interview was, by universal consensus, a catastrophe. Andrew stepped back from public royal duties within days.
Giuffre filed a civil lawsuit in 2021 under New York’s Child Victims Act. In February 2022, the case was settled out of court — reportedly for around £12 million — with no admission of liability. Andrew always denied the allegations. Giuffre, tragically, died by suicide in 2025 at the age of forty-one. She was not alive to see the arrest, but her family was.
“At last, today, our broken hearts have been lifted at the news that no one is above the law, not even royalty. He was never a prince. For survivors everywhere, Virginia did this for you.”Giuffre’s Siblings, in a Statement to CBS News
The Epstein Files: Three Million Pages of Trouble
If Andrew hoped that the settlements, the silence, and the quiet retreat from public life would eventually allow the story to fade, the United States Department of Justice had other ideas. On January 30, 2026, the DOJ released over three million pages of documents related to Epstein’s activities. Within those pages were communications that didn’t merely embarrass Andrew — they implicated him in conduct that crossed from the tawdry into the potentially criminal.
Emails appeared to show that Andrew, while serving as the UK’s special representative for international trade and investment between 2001 and 2011, forwarded confidential government reports to Epstein. One email thread, dated November 30, 2010, showed the then-prince forwarding official briefings on his trade visits to Singapore, Hong Kong, and Vietnam — complete with details of investment opportunities — to Epstein just minutes after receiving them from his special adviser. Andrew apparently told Epstein he was seeking his “comments, views or ideas” on the material. Another communication detailed an investment opportunity in Afghanistan. The documents also included photographs of Andrew in compromising positions that were displayed on screen during Attorney General Pam Bondi’s testimony before the House Judiciary Committee on February 11.
Charge: Misconduct in public office
Maximum Sentence: Life imprisonment (UK)
Arresting Force: Thames Valley Police
Date of Arrest: February 19, 2026
Locations Searched: Royal Lodge, Berkshire & Wood Farm, Sandringham Estate, Norfolk
Additional Assessment: Thames Valley Police also confirmed it is assessing a separate allegation that Epstein sent a woman to Andrew at Royal Lodge in 2010 for sexual purposes
The Titles, the Lodge, and the Long Goodbye
The noose — metaphorical, of course, though Andrew might be forgiven for wondering — had been tightening for years. After the Newsnight interview, Andrew withdrew from public duties. In 2019, the U.S. Department of Justice formally requested an interview with him as part of its criminal investigation into Epstein. He did not oblige. In November 2025, the House Oversight Committee requested his testimony to help identify Epstein’s co-conspirators. He did not respond by the deadline.
Then came the titles. In October 2025, King Charles III stripped his brother of his honours, styles, and royal titles — including the Dukedom of York and his birth title of Prince. The man once fourth in line to the throne, the Queen’s reputedly favourite child, was reduced to a civilian: Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor. The bells of Westminster Abbey, which had traditionally rung on his birthday, fell silent. Shortly thereafter, he was evicted from Royal Lodge in Windsor, the thirty-room mansion he had called home since 2003, and relocated to Wood Farm on the Sandringham Estate — comfortable, certainly, but a far cry from the 1,500 acres he’d grown accustomed to.
It was at Wood Farm, on the morning of his birthday, that the police came calling.
✦ ✦ ✦
The Palace Responds (Eventually)
King Charles III’s statement, released with notable swiftness, was signed personally — “Charles R” — rather than issued through Buckingham Palace’s usual machinery. It read, in the measured prose of a man who has been briefed extensively by solicitors: “I have learned with the deepest concern the news about Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and suspicion of misconduct in public office. What now follows is the full, fair and proper process by which this issue is investigated in the appropriate manner and by the appropriate authorities. In this, as I have said before, they have our full and wholehearted support and co-operation. Let me state clearly: the law must take its course.”
Translation: He’s your problem now.
The statement was careful, clinical, and about as warm as a January wind off the North Sea. It was also, in its way, the final act of a familial separation that had been proceeding in stages for the better part of a decade. The royal commentator Sandro Monetti put it rather more colourfully, telling CNN that the arrest put in question not merely Andrew’s future but the entire future of the royal family. The political commentator Michael Walker described it as “incredibly damaging” for the monarchy and the British establishment at large, noting that the royal family had always seemed to be “one step behind” the scandal — never ahead of it, never on top of it, always reacting rather than reckoning.
Not Above the Law — A Novel Concept
Andrew’s arrest is the first time a senior member of the British royal family has been apprehended over potential criminal activity in modern history. (The last time a Windsor had a notable brush with the law, Princess Anne was fined under the Dangerous Dogs Act in 2002. One does not wish to make light of dangerous dogs, but the comparison rather speaks for itself.)
He is not the only prominent figure to find himself in the investigative crosshairs following the Epstein file releases. London’s Metropolitan Police searched the home of former Labour cabinet minister Peter Mandelson earlier in February as part of a separate investigation into misconduct in public office — Mandelson, too, having allegedly shared confidential government information with Epstein. The decision by Prime Minister Keir Starmer to appoint Mandelson as British Ambassador to the United States, even as these revelations were emerging, brought enormous pressure on Starmer’s government, culminating in the resignation of his chief of staff.
In the United States, the reaction was pointed. Democratic lawmakers used the arrest to highlight what they characterized as American inaction. Representative Jake Auchincloss of Massachusetts told CNN that Great Britain was holding its powerful and privileged to account and that the United States should do the same. His colleague Stephen Lynch called it a “great contrast” and said he wished the American government were following suit.
“Look what the British government is doing in light of the evidence, and look what the United States government is doing. Nothing.”Rep. Stephen Lynch (D-MA) to CNN
What Happens Next
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor remains in police custody as of this writing. Misconduct in public office is a common-law offence in England and Wales, requiring prosecutors to demonstrate that a public officer willfully neglected to perform their duty or willfully misconducted themselves to such a degree as to amount to an abuse of the public’s trust. Given that the allegations centre on the sharing of classified trade documents with a convicted sex offender, the threshold for “abuse of trust” may not prove an especially high bar to clear.
Thames Valley Police have confirmed they are also separately assessing information regarding the alleged trafficking of a young woman to Andrew at Royal Lodge in 2010. Where that assessment leads remains to be seen.
The investigation is ongoing. The police have asked for patience. The palace has expressed its cooperation. The prime minister has reminded everyone that nobody is above the law. And Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor — the prince who could not sweat, who remembered Pizza Express but not the girl in the photograph, who forwarded state secrets to a paedophile and called it networking — sits in a police station on his sixty-sixth birthday, contemplating the most British of understatements: a spot of bother.
Happy birthday, Andrew. The nation, for once, has remembered.
✦ ✦ ✦
Frequently Asked Questions
Why was former Prince Andrew arrested on February 19, 2026?
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor was arrested by Thames Valley Police on suspicion of misconduct in public office. The arrest followed revelations in the Epstein files — over three million documents released by the U.S. Department of Justice — which appeared to show that Andrew shared confidential UK government documents with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein during his tenure as UK trade envoy (2001–2011). Police conducted searches at Royal Lodge in Berkshire and Wood Farm on the Sandringham Estate in Norfolk.
What is the maximum sentence for misconduct in public office in the UK?
Misconduct in public office is a common-law offence in England and Wales that carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. The offence requires prosecutors to prove that a public officer willfully neglected to perform their duty or willfully misconducted themselves to such a degree as to amount to an abuse of the public’s trust.
When was Prince Andrew stripped of his royal titles?
King Charles III stripped Andrew of his honours, styles, and royal titles in October 2025. This included his peerage title of Duke of York and his birth title of Prince. He is now legally known as Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor. He was subsequently evicted from Royal Lodge in Windsor and relocated to Wood Farm on the Sandringham Estate.
Who was Virginia Giuffre and what did she allege about Prince Andrew?
Virginia Roberts Giuffre alleged that Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell trafficked her to have sex with the then-Prince Andrew on three occasions, including when she was 17 years old. She filed a civil lawsuit in 2021 which was settled in February 2022 for a reported £12 million, with no admission of liability. Andrew denied all allegations. Giuffre died by suicide in 2025 at the age of 41. Her family welcomed the news of Andrew’s arrest.
What did King Charles III say about Andrew’s arrest?
King Charles III personally signed a statement (as “Charles R”) saying he had “learned with the deepest concern” the news and that “the law must take its course.” He pledged the royal family’s “full and wholehearted support and co-operation” with the police investigation, continuing the stance the palace had taken in preceding weeks as the Epstein file revelations mounted.
Is Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor the first royal to be arrested?
Yes, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s arrest marks the first time a senior member of the British royal family has been apprehended over potential criminal activity in modern times. The most recent notable legal incident involving a royal was Princess Anne being fined under the Dangerous Dogs Act in 2002, though she was not arrested.
